HomeAcknowledgementsEthical StatementOur missionOur visionTeam
OverviewMarine Astrolabes InventoryPewter from Shipwrecks
Overview
OverviewEtude du site des canons du rocher blanc à El Hamdania, CherchellPreliminary Study of a Shipwreck in the Bay of El Hamdania Beach (Cherchell, Algeria)
OverviewMaritime Archaeology of Baleal
OverviewCheck-List for Investors in Treasure Hunting VenturesCultural Heritage LawEthics TextsResources 2 to deleteShort Texts about Treasure Hunting
All PostsThe Cultural Affiliation of ShipwrecksArchaeology and ChangeLarge and Small Boats: Reflections from Nautical ArchaeologySharing primary data before the work is overArchaeology is public or it is nothingStandardizing the publication of wooden hull structuresPepper Wreck 15 Years LaterThe Nautical Archaeology Digital Library Blog
ShipbuildingReport a findContact us

Large and Small Boats: Reflections from Nautical Archaeology

Juan David Sarmiento Rodríguez & Jesús Alberto Aldana Mendoza•
ResearchReflectionsShipbuilding

Juan David Sarmiento Rodríguez & Jesús Alberto Aldana Mendoza

Around a boat, regardless of its characteristics, a large number of questions can be asked: what materials were used for its construction? What type of construction was necessary to build it? Who built it? Where did it come from? What can it be used for? What is its temporality? How was it lost? Among many others. Nautical archaeology, therefore, has an important task to develop since around all the bodies of water in the world it is possible to find all kinds of ships used years, decades, centuries and even millennia ago. For this case, the present reflection starts from the different approaches that may exist when interpreting a large ship (for example, a ship of the line destined for war) or a vessel of a much smaller size (such as a canoe for fishing).

Beyond the obvious difference that exists in the sizes of the ships, the starting point is those questions that can be answered about the historical societies that inhabited a certain territory, based on the remains that were once lost and are interpreted today by maritime, underwater and nautical archaeology. Therefore, both cases are framed in the analytical interpretations of these disciplines, however, the main difference that can be discussed in this space is concerning the "scales". Of course there are some points in common, since regardless of the size of the ship for both cases it is intended to understand, for example: the phases corresponding to shipbuilding and its technical complexes, their uses while they were functional elements, technological evolutions that they experienced, among others.

Based on the aforementioned, the main parallel to be established lies in that differentiation that may exist between "industrial shipbuilding" and "artisanal shipbuilding" (to name them in some way). In this order of ideas, in the case of the first it is possible to point out that the questions that arise are established within the framework of a spatial scale linked to transits of long trajectories of thousands of kilometers (ships used to connect continents or oceans). The second, for its part, in most cases raises issues more related to transit at a local scale (connecting islands, bays or regional territories).

On the other hand, large vessels offer a very particular level of analytical detail, insofar as it is possible to ask them even the name by which they were called, instead, in smaller vessels this would be extremely complicated, which generates that the questions that are make to them must go by another line. Thus, the questions that arise from industrial shipbuilding have the ability to ask not only "what type of ship is it?", but also "which is it specifically?", instead, from artisanal shipbuilding it would be possible to question "what constructive style does the boat have?" or "to which community did this possibly belong to?"

Now, it is clear that one of the main interpretative differences that exist are subject to the availability of information sources. On one hand, given the complex infrastructure that a large interoceanic ship required, the archaeological evidence that is preserved over time may be greater and very diverse. In the case of a canoe, for example, its size limits the number of artifacts that can be found in a certain context (all subject, of course, to the site formation processes). On the other hand, for large ships, the availability of written historical documents allows a greater number of sources to be consulted to fully understand the elements.

All postsBack to globe